Bilateral renal artery revascularisation in heart failure.

Renal artery stenosis can complicate the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, as it is a conventional contraindication to the use of ACE inhibitors. We report a case in which bilateral renal artery revascularisation allowed the safe reintroduction of enalapril (and subsequently sacubitril valsartan) in a patient with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. There is a role for renal artery angioplasty in selected patients to allow optimal medical therapy for patients with heart failure due to impaired systolic function.

The prevalence of accessory renal arteries in sudanese population in Khartoum State: a cross-sectional CT study from 2017 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery variations are clinically significant due to their implications for surgical procedures and renal function. However, data on these variations in Sudanese populations are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of renal artery variations in a Sudanese population. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in Khartoum state from October 2017 to October 2020. A total of 400 Sudanese participants who underwent abdominal CT scans were included. Data on demographic characteristics, kidney measurements, and renal vasculature were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 46.7 ± 18 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution. Overall, renal artery variations were present in 11% of participants, with accessory renal arteries observed in 6% of the study population. Among those with accessory vessels, 50% were on the right side, 29.2% on the left, and 20.8% bilateral, distributed across hilar 29.2%, lower polar 29.2%, and upper polar 41.7% regions. No significant associations were found between accessory renal arteries and age or gender (p-value > 0.05). However, participants with accessory renal arteries exhibited significantly narrower width 5.0 ± 1.4 than those with no with accessory renal arteries 5.8 ± 1.1 (p-value 0.002) Early dividing renal arteries were found in 5% of participants, with nearly half being bilateral. No significant associations were found between the presence of early dividing renal arteries and demographic or renal measurements (p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence and characteristics of renal artery variations in a Sudanese population. The findings contribute to our understanding of renal anatomy in this demographic and can inform clinical practice and surgical planning, particularly in renal transplantation and other renal procedures.

Open bypass revascularisation for endovascular-resistant transplant renal artery stenosis secondary to mechanical renal artery kinking.

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) represents a significant vascular complication subsequent to renal transplantation. This pathology is associated with grave implications including graft dysfunction and mortality. Early identification and therapeutical intervention are imperative for preserving graft longevity and achieving optimal clinical outcomes. We detail the case of a male in his 20s, following renal transplantation, who encountered recurrent TRAS, aetiologically linked to mechanical arterial kinking. Initial management using endovascular techniques yielded insufficient resolution. Consequently, the persistence of endovascular-resistant stenosis necessitated a surgical bypass intervention using the great saphenous vein, granting a 2-year period devoid of restenosis. The existing literature emphasises the indispensability of discerning the appropriate juncture for transitioning from endovascular to surgical management in TRAS cases. The robustness and durability of bypass grafts present an efficacious therapeutical strategy in contemporaneous practice.

Retrospective analysis of the perioperative outcome in living donor kidney transplantation with multiple renal arteries: does accessory vessel ligation affect the outcome?

PURPOSE: Accurate surgical reconstruction of arterial vascular supply is a crucial part of living kidney transplantation (LDKT). The presence of multiple renal arteries (MRA) in grafts can be challenging. In the present study, we investigated the impact of ligation versus anastomosis of small accessory graft arteries on the perioperative outcome. METHODS: Clinical and radiological outcomes of 51 patients with MRA out of a total of 308 patients who underwent LDKT with MRA between 2011 and 2020 were stratified in two groups and analyzed. In group 1 (20 patients), ligation of accessory arteries (ARAs) and group 2 (31 patients) anastomosis of ARAs was performed. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the anastomosis-, surgery-, and warm ischemia time (WIT) in favor of group 1. Students t-test showed comparable serum creatinine levels of 2.33 (± 1.75) to 1.68 (± 0.83) mg/dL in group 1 and 2.63 (± 2.47) to 1.50 (± 0.41) mg/dL in group 2, were seen from 1 week to 1 year after transplant. No increased rates of Delayed graft function (DGF), primary transplant dysfunction and transplant rejection were seen, but graft loss and revision rates were slightly higher when the ARAs were ligated. Analysis of Doppler sonography revealed that segmental perfusion deficits tend to regenerate during the clinical course. CONCLUSION: Ligation of smaller accessory renal arteries may not affect the outcome of living kidney transplantation, except for a minor increase in the reoperation rate. Segmental perfusion deficits of the graft seem to regenerate in most cases as seen in Doppler sonography.

Surveillance of a Transplant Kidney Harboring a Stable Renal Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report.

Renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) may occur in patients with transplanted kidneys, either through de novo development or as a preexisting feature of the donor kidney. How this vascular condition progresses in patients on immunosuppressive therapy after transplantation is poorly understood, and to our knowledge, consensus guidelines for treating transplant patients with RAA have not been developed. We present the case of a kidney allograft recipient on triple immunosuppressive therapy in whom postoperative imaging revealed a 13-mm renal artery aneurysm in the renal hilum not amenable to endovascular intervention. We review systemic influences on aneurysm formation and how matrix metalloproteinases may interact with immunosuppressive medications. Surveillance imaging over 5 years has shown a stable aneurysm, and the patient has maintained stable renal function with adequate creatinine levels and no adverse symptoms.

Safety of Patients with Renal Artery Aneurysm to Proceed with Living Donation.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is a rare condition that involves dilation of all layers of the arterial wall of the renal artery. The risk of rupture is rare, but intervention is recommended for larger aneurysms. Surgical decision-making regarding live donor renal transplantation (LDRT) centers around safety for the living donor, and laterality of the donated kidney is based on providing the donor with the best longevity pertaining to the remaining kidney. We looked to review our long-term outcomes surrounding live donor transplants from donors with RAA with ex vivo resection and reconstruction prior to implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of all laparoscopic live donor transplant nephrectomies with ex vivo aneurysm resection, reconstruction, and implantation at a single center. RESULTS: Three pairs of patients underwent successful laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, RAA resection, reconstruction, and transplantation of kidney. 2 males and 1 female ages 47 to 58 years of age underwent transplantation. The donors at 5 years of follow-up were noted to be functioning appropriately with no long-term sequelae of their donation and a mean remanent kidney function of 63 mL/min. DISCUSSION: For potential live donors with asymptomatic, unilateral renal artery aneurysm and no systemic disease, live donation with ex vivo resection and reconstruction can be performed with excellent long-term donor and recipient outcomes.

Impact of Accessory Renal Artery Embolization on Renal Deterioration Under Endovascular Aortic Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management strategy for patients with accessory renal arteries undergoing endovascular aortic repair is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of accessory renal artery (aRA) embolization on postoperative renal deterioration and to identify the predictors of postoperative renal deterioration in patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted at our hospital. Of 331 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair between April 2011 and February 2021, 29 patients with an aRA were included in this study. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal volume reduction rate, infarcted renal volume, and quantity of contrast use for postoperative renal deterioration were analyzed. The correlation coefficients of the correlations between infarcted renal volume, renal volume reduction rate, and decrease in eGFR and the rate of aRA diameter were also analyzed. Multivariable nominal logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the odds of postoperative renal deterioration. RESULTS: The renal volume reduction rate and infarcted renal volume had a significant positive correlation with the decrease in eGFR. Body surface area and preoperative renal volume were significantly but negatively correlated with the decrease in eGFR. The infarcted renal volume, renal volume reduction rate, and decrease in eGFR were significantly and positively correlated with the aRA diameter. The odds ratio for decreased eGFR rate in preoperative renal volume was .96 (95% CI 0.930‒.996, P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR with aRA embolization impacts postoperative renal deterioration in patients with preoperative low renal volume, and the diameter of the embolized aRA might be a predictor of postoperative renal deterioration.

CIRSE Standards of Practice for the Endovascular Treatment of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms and Pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms is an effective, minimally invasive treatment that has been successfully used since the early 1990s, with refined and expanded techniques and tools currently offering excellent outcomes. Due to increased detection of such lesions in recent years, many of which are asymptomatic, revision of the indications for intervention and the correct endovascular treatment approaches has become essential. PURPOSE: This document will presume that the indication for treatment is clear and approved by the multidisciplinary team and will define the standards required for the performance of each intervention, as well as their relative advantages and limitations. CIRSE Standards of Practice documents are not intended to impose a standard of clinical patient care, but recommend a reasonable approach to, and best practices for, the performance of the endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. METHODS: The writing group was established by the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee and consisted of five clinicians with internationally recognised expertise in endovascular treatments. The writing group reviewed the existing literature on visceral and renal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, performing an evidence search using PubMed to identify publications in English and relating to human subjects from 1990 to 2022. The final recommendations were formulated through consensus. RESULTS: Endovascular treatment has an established role in the successful management of visceral and renal artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms, and this Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for its safe performance.

Risks and benefits of renal artery stenting in fibromuscular dysplasia: Lessons from the ARCADIA-POL study.

INTRODUCTION: Although renal stenting is the standard revascularization method for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) (FMD-RAS), stenting in fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) RAS is usually limited to periprocedural complications of angioplasty and primary arterial dissection. The main aim of the study was to retrospectively analyze the immediate and long-term results of renal stenting versus angioplasty in patients with FMD. METHODS: Of 343 patients in the ARCADIA-POL registry, 58 patients underwent percutaneous treatment due to FMD-RAS (in 70 arteries). Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) was performed as an initial treatment in 61 arteries (PTRA-group), whereas primary stenting was undertaken in nine arteries (stent-group). Stent-related complications were defined as: in-stent restenosis > 50% (ISR); stent fracture; under-expansion; or migration. RESULTS: In the PTRA-group, the initial restenosis rate was 50.8%. A second procedure was then performed in 22 arteries: re-PTRA (12 arteries) or stenting (10 arteries). The incidence of recurrent restenosis after re-PTRA was 41.7%. Complications occurred in seven of 10 (70%) arteries secondarily treated by stenting: two with under-expansion and five with ISR. In the stent-group, stent under-expansion occurred in one case (11.1%) and ISR in three of nine stents (33.3%). In combined analysis of stented arteries, either primarily or secondarily, stent-related complications occurred in 11/19 stenting procedures (57.9%): three due to under-expansion and eight due to ISRs. Finally, despite several revascularization attempts, four of 19 (21%) stented arteries were totally occluded and one was significantly stenosed at follow-up imaging. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that renal stenting in FMD-RAS may carry a high risk of late complications, including stent occlusion. Further observational data from large-scale registries are required.

Renal Artery Reimplantation Versus Bypass in Elective Open Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Complex open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often necessitates revascularization of renal arteries by either renal artery reimplantation or bypass. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and short term outcomes between these 2 strategies of renal artery revascularization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent open AAA repair from 2004 to 2020 at our own institution. Patients who underwent elective suprarenal, juxtarenal, or type 4 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and a retrospectively maintained database of AAA patients. Patients who had symptomatic aneurysm or significant renal artery stenosis before AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative conditions, renal function, bypass patency, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients underwent either renal artery reimplantation (n = 86) or bypass (n = 57) during this time period. The mean age was 69.7 years and 76.2% of the patients were male. Median preoperative creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL for the renal bypass group versus 1.06 mg/dL for reimplantation (P = 0.088). Both groups had similar median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of >60 mL/min (P = 0.13). Bypass and reimplantation groups had similar perioperative complications including acute kidney injury (51.8% vs. 49.4% P = 0.78), inpatient dialysis (3.6% vs. 1.2% P = 0.56), myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 2.4% P = 0.99), and death (3.5% vs. 4.7% P = 0.99), respectively. During the 30-day follow-up period, renal artery stenosis was identified in 9.8% of bypasses and 6.7% of reimplantations (P = 0.71). Six point one percent of patients in the bypass group had renal failure requiring dialysis (both acute and permanent) compared to 1.3% in reimplantation group (P = 0.3). For those who had 1-year follow-up, the reimplantation group had higher new incidence of renal artery stenosis compared to bypass group (6 vs. 0 P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Given that there is no significant difference in outcomes between renal artery reimplantation and bypass within 30 days or at 1-year follow-up, both bypass and reimplantation are acceptable means for renal artery revascularization during elective AAA repair.

A rare cause and an even rarer treatment of hypertension in a 5-year-old boy: Mid-aortic syndrome.

Renal artery stenosis is one of the common vascular diseases that cause hypertension in children. However, renal artery aneurysms and abdominal aortic aneurysms, which may be components of mid-aortic syndrome, are rarely associated with renal artery stenosis. Despite its rarity, early diagnosis and treatment are critical to prevent fatal complications. Currently, non-surgical invasive techniques are considered the first choice for treatment, but in some cases, surgery is inevitable. Here, we present a 5-year-old boy with a mid-aortic syndrome. The patient presented with a history of severe headache and epistaxis 5-6 times a day and was diagnosed with hypertension. A 9 × 9 mm saccular aneurysm on the anterior surface of the abdominal aorta at the level of the left renal artery ostium, and a 12 mm aneurysm in the left renal artery after a stenotic segment at the hilum level was detected in the doppler USG and contrast-enhanced imaging techniques. The patient was operated on electively. We used a PTFE patch to repair the abdominal aorta and, saphenous vein which was taken from his father to repair the renal artery. The patient recovered well and was discharged on the 18th day.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative renal artery embolization prior to radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Is it necessary?

INTRODUCTION: Radical nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is still the treatment of choice for all stages except for stage I and IV, which need patient selectivity. The purpose of Renal Artery Embolization (RAE) pre-operative before radical nephrectomy is to facilitate resection, reduce bleeding, and reduce the time to surgery, but the necessity of this procedure is still debatable. This study investigates the efficacy of pre-operative Renal Artery Embolization (PRAE) before radical nephrectomy for RCC patients. METHODS: The systematic searches based on PRISMA guidelines were conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medrxiv, and ScienceDirect databases with pre-defined keywords. Both analyses, quantitative and qualitative, were performed to assess blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 921 patients from 8 eligible studies were included. The blood loss was significantly lower in the PRAE group compared to the control group (p = < 0.00001; SMD -20 mL; 95%CI -0.29, -0.12). There is no statistically significant difference between RAE and without RAE in the transfusion rate nephrectomy (p = 0.53, OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.16, 2.57), mean operative time (p = 0.69; SMD 5.91; 95% CI -23.25, 35.07), mean length of hospital stay (p = 0.05; SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.00, 1.12), and mean length of stay in the ICU (p = 0.45; SMD 11.61; 95% CI -18.35, 41.57) Conclusions: PRAE before radical nephrectomy significantly reduces blood loss in RCC patients but is similar in the surgical time, transfusion rate, and length of hospital stay and ICU stay.

Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension and Difficult-to-Control Hypertension - Consensus Document of the Croatian Hypertension League - Croatian Society of Hypertension, Croatian Cardiac Society, Croatian Endovascular Initiative, Croatian Society for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Croatian Renal Association, and Croatian Society of Family Physicians of the Croatian Medical Association.

Renal denervation (RDN) as a method of treating arterial hypertension (AH) was introduced in Croatia in 2012. A multidisciplinary team and a network of hospitals that diagnose and treat patients with severe forms of AH were established, and a very strict diagnostic-treatment algorithm was prepared. At monthly meetings patients with truly resistant hypertension who were candidates for RDN were discussed. According to the 2021 ESH position statement and 2023 ESH guidelines, RDN is considered an alternative and additional, not a competitive method of treating patients with various forms of AH which must be performed by following a structured procedure and the patient's preference should be considered. In view of the changes in the global scientific community, the Croatian Hypertension League brings this consensus document on RDN conducted with radiofrequency-based catheter, the only currently available method in Croatia. In this document, exclusion and inclusion criteria are shown, as well as three groups of patients in whom RDN could be considered. The new diagnostic-treatment algorithm is prepared and follow-up procedure is explained. In Croatia, RDN is reimbursed by the national insurance company, thus pharmacoeconomic analyses is also shown. Criteria required by an individual centre to be approved of RDN are listed, and plans for prospective research on RDN in Croatia, including the Croatian registry for RDN, are discussed.

[Five-year dynamics adrenergic reactivity of erythrocytes after radio-frequency sympathic denervation of renal arteries in patients with resistant arterial hypertension].

AIM: To study the initial state of adrenergic reactivity and the five-year dynamics of the beta-adrenergic reactivity index of erythrocyte membranes and the manifestation of the antihypertensive effect of the procedure for radiofrequency destruction of sympathetic structures of the renal artery in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The analysis included 42 patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RH). The renal denervation (RD) procedure of the kidneys was performed by endovascular bilateral transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of the renal arteries. The study of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (BPM) and the determination of ß-adrenoreactivity of erythrocytes (ß-ARM) by changes in the osmoresistance of erythrocyte membranes were performed initially, 1 week, 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after RD. Patients retrospectively, at a follow-up period of 6 months after RD, were divided into responders (decrease in blood pressure by 10 or more mm Hg) and non-responders (decrease in blood pressure less than 10 mm Hg). RESULTS: 6 months after the RD, the number of responders was 28 people (66.7%), after 5 years - 31 people (73.8%). At the time of inclusion in the study, the median ß-ARM in the group of non-responders was not significantly higher than in the group of responders. After 6 months after the RD procedure, the ß-ARM indicator in the non-responder group was significantly lower than in the responder group (p = 0.043). With further follow-up in the group of responders, an increase in the median ß-ARM was noted, which reached significant differences relative to the baseline values in the group at follow-up periods of 1 year (p = 0.036) and 5 years (p = 0.004) after RD. The change in the ß-ARM indicator in the non-responder group was wavy in nature, the changes did not reach the significance criteria. CONCLUSION: Renal denervation in 73.8% of cases is accompanied by a stable antihypertensive response for 5 years of observation and an increase in ß-ARM, which may indicate the implementation of compensatory mechanisms in conditions of increasing activity of the sympathoadrenal system in response to a decrease in blood pressure.

A Retrospective Analysis of the 1-Year Graft Survival Rate in Indonesian Renal Transplant Recipients With Multiple Renal Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease because of its association with improved survival and quality of life. The debate over multiple renal arteries (MRA) vs a single renal artery regarding kidney function, posttransplant complications, and graft and patient survival remains ongoing. Our goal was to determine the 1-year graft survival rate among renal transplant recipients with MRA at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2012 and December 2020, including all kidney transplant candidates with MRA. Data on graft survival, patient demographics, previous renal transplantation, duration of hemodialysis, and delayed graft function were collected and analyzed using SPSS 24. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for 1-year survival. RESULTS: Among 752 renal transplant recipients, 104 cases had MRA. The majority were men (71.5%), and the median age of recipients was 47 years. One-year graft survival was observed in 96% of cases, whereas patient survival was 97.7%. No significant difference was found in graft survival based on the number of arteries (single renal artery vs MRA), length of hemodialysis, or previous renal transplantation. However, delayed graft function was significantly associated with graft survival. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that 1-year graft survival in renal transplant recipients with MRA is not significantly affected by the length of hemodialysis before surgery or previous renal transplantation.

Impact of Inner Layer Renorrhaphy Suture on Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Formation Following Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of resection base inner layer renorrhaphy suture type on renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) rate following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: Five hundred and sixty-three consecutive RAPNs performed by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into 3 categories: (1) No base suture, (2) monofilament barbed suture (2-0 V-Loc 180 absorbable suture, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), (3) polyglactin 910 (2-0 Vicryl coated suture, Ethicon Inc, Cincinnati, OH). In a secondary analysis, we evaluated suturing (Vicryl and V-Loc) vs no base suture. All patients had outer cortical renorrhaphy performed with 0-Vicryl suture utilizing the standard sliding clip technique. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients (19.5%) had V-Loc suturing, 255 patients (45.3%) had Vicryl suturing, and 198 patients (35.2%) had no base suture. Patients had a median age of 62.8years (interquartile range: 53.5-69.7) and median RENAL score was 8 (6-9). Median mass size from preoperative imaging was 3.0 cm (2.5-4.0) for V-Loc, 3.3 cm (2.5-4.2) for Vicryl, and 2.0 cm (1.8-3.0) for no base suture (P < .001). Overall, 21 patients (3.7%) developed a symptomatic postoperative RAP. The rate of RAP was 3.6% (4/110) for V-Loc, 3.9% (10/255) for 2-0 Vicryl, and 3.5% (7/198) for no base suture (P = 1.00). Similarly, the rate of RAP was 3.5% (7/198) for no base suture and 3.8% (14/365) for base suture (P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Utilization of base suture and type of base suture used during RAPN was not predictive of postoperative RAP development.

Holographic 3D renal segments reconstruction protects renal function by promote choice of selective renal artery clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of selective artery clamping (SAC) and main artery clamping (MAC) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) on renal function and the influence of holographic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of renal segments on the selection between SAC and MAC. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent RAPN at First Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University between December 2016 and July 2022. According to the clamping methods, the patients were divided into the SAC group and the MAC group. The primary outcome was renal function. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients (194 in the SAC group and 228 in the MAC group) were included. The RAPN procedures were all completed successfully. The patients in SAC group had less glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in the affected kidney (8.6 ± 7.0 ml/min vs. 18.7 ± 10.9 ml/min, P < 0.001) and minor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease (4.3 ± 10.5 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 12.1 ml/min, P < 0.001) than those in MAC group. Among 37 patients with baseline renal insufficiency, the GFR decline of the affected kidney in the SAC subgroup was significantly lower than in the MAC subgroup (5.5 ± 6.5 ml/min vs. 14.3 ± 9.2 ml/min, P = 0.002). The proportion of patients who underwent 3D reconstruction was significant higher in the SAC group than in the MAC group. (65.46% vs. 28.07%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SAC technique during RAPN may serve as a protective measure for renal function, while the implementation of holographic 3D renal segment reconstruction technique may facilitate optimal selection of SAC.

Catheter-based renal artery denervation: facts and expectations.

Catheter-based renal artery denervation (RAD) is entering a new era. After the disappointing results of SYMPLICITY-HTN 3 trial in year 2014, several technical and methodological advancements led to execution of important SHAM-controlled randomized trials with promising results. Now, the 2023 ESH Guidelines give RAD a class of recommendation II with a Level of Evidence B. Currently, catheter-based RAD has two main areas of application: (a) Hypertensive patients who are still untreated, in whom RAD is a sort of a first-line treatment; (b) Difficult-to-control or true resistant hypertensive patients. Notably, randomized SHAM-controlled trials met their primary end-point in both these conditions. So far, we do not dispose of established predictors of the antihypertensive response to RAD. Some data suggest that younger patients with systo-diastolic hypertension, absence of diffuse atherosclerosis and evidence of sympathetic nervous system overactivity experience a better BP response to the procedure. We reviewed the available data on catheter-based RAD and included an updated meta-analysis of the results of the available SHAM-controlled trials. Overall, the reduction in 24-h systolic blood pressure (BP) after RAD exceeded that after SHAM by 4.58 mmHg (95% CI 3.07-6.10) in untreated patients, and by 3.82 mmHg (95% CI 2.46-5.18) in treated patients, without significant heterogeneity across trials, patient phenotype (untreated versus treated patients) and technique (radiofrequency versus ultrasound). There were no important safety signals related to the procedure. Notably, some data suggest that RAD could be an effective additional approach in patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions characterized by sympathetic nervous system overactivity.